There are many ways to get around it I'm sure, in the case of the above invasion by two corps if they simply attacked at separate times it couldn't be proven they were even working together. So to police this would be a nightmare.
I'm not wanting to use any single example here for obvious reasons. I'm not wanting to turn this into a finger pointing (or extending) session.
If I were in a game, and an opposing corp came to me and said "I'll call a truce with you if you want to help me destroy this asset" I'd have to give it some consideration, would that not make for a fine opportunity to elminate some of the opposition? I'd also have to seriously consider the risk of after said invasion, I'd attack the one I'd held the truce with, hoping they were weakend more my the attack than I was.
Now however if you're one of the two attacking teams, you're happy (I hope) by the outcome. But the attacked team is gonna feel far more inclined to cry foul. Was this "unfair" game play?
You just said you thought it was hilarious that two teams "stooped to the level,.." but what about it two weaker teams pooled together to take out the stronger? Would that be viewed the same?

You just said you thought it was hilarious that two teams "stooped to the level,.." but what about it two weaker teams pooled together to take out the stronger? Would that be viewed the same?

I would say same no matter what, you can't win them all and if your ego is that fragile find a new game. This only for games that have a rule in place, if no rule then there is nothing really to complain about.....although most all view mega corping as a shady tactic.

Finally sacked up and went in alone, congrats!!

Speaking of sack up, I was hopeing you would just say good game instead of TRYING to find an excuses for your corp getting pwned all game, guess not though.

Good shooting Butch both times, little slow the second time

All in all a good game and thanks RP for hosting the game. See you all next tournie!

You just said you thought it was hilarious that two teams "stooped to the level,.." but what about it two weaker teams pooled together to take out the stronger? Would that be viewed the same?

No mega corping means no mega corping regardless of the strength or weakness of the attacking or defending corp.

There's always going to be ways around this however, and no way to prove MC one way or the other.

That screen cap we caught was just a little too blatant to be taken any other way. I'm disappointed really. And don't take this the wrong way, I'm not whining, we've been running the self destruct script all week. I'm disappointed in the lack of integrity of today's so-called top players, but sadly, not surprised.

I guess, for future games with a no Mega Corp rule, just means don't get caught Mega Corping. That's about the best we can do.

RP has already said it wasnt MC and no rules have been broken, so stop making excuses for getting pwned!!!

there is no MegaCorping rule in place (I just reread the rules to refresh my own mind) only asset sharing, and there is no evidence of that here.

2. No transfer of traders or resources between the different teams.

RP has already said it wasnt MC and no rules have been broken, so stop making excuses for getting pwned!!!

No, he asked if it was Mega Corping, reviewed the rules and found there was no rule against MC.

Probably because it's nearly impossible to prove, and just as difficult to enforce.