www.ClassicTW.com http://classictw.com/ |
|
TWX Proxy Feature Request http://classictw.com/viewtopic.php?f=15&t=32032 |
Page 6 of 6 |
Author: | Adept [ Fri May 27, 2016 8:33 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: TWX Proxy Feature Request |
I am pretty certain I discovered a couple issues with getDirList: 1. The example uses asterisks though I can only get returns on wildcards using question marks (using Windows 7). 2. Wildcards do not appear to be preserved in complied scripts. 3. The format command seems to return 0 in compiled scripts--only test with NUMBERS. ETA, separate issues: 1. There seems to be an issue when using trim in compiled script that will not compile the script--though I have not been able to track its condition down, I did several different tests and they all compiled, but in another script it would not compile until I removed that line. 2. CORRECTION DOES NOT APPEAR TO BE AN ISSUE--POSSIBLY ONLY WITH CERTAIN COMMANDS?--In Windows 10 you cannot compile scripts; it errors on something about not finding Window 0 on line 3. |
Author: | The Bounty Hunter [ Mon May 30, 2016 5:31 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: TWX Proxy Feature Request |
Only thing I can comment on is compiling in Windows 10. I have not had any issues with it. Just compiled a script a few min ago. |
Author: | Adept [ Mon May 30, 2016 10:45 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: TWX Proxy Feature Request |
That is strange I tried to compile simple echo and it worked, then tried a large script and it worked again; although there is a very long pause, usually it just flashes the window and is done. The other day it would not compile anything, just threw errors, but the script I was trying to compile would go on my Win7 machine no problem (I had to wait until I got home to compile it, my Win10 is on my laptop). Maybe the issue is certain commands that are newer? I have been experimenting with several of the undocumented commands. |
Author: | Adept [ Wed Jun 15, 2016 1:23 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: TWX Proxy Feature Request |
Anybody have an luck getting even trigger for script stop to work? I tried every way I can think of and only get back too many parameters errors. ETA: Also I have been testing the connection lost and client disconnected event triggers and they do not seem to fire. * Okay resolved the issue for both problems the event needs to be "quoted". |
Author: | LoneStar [ Wed Aug 03, 2016 7:09 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: TWX Proxy Feature Request |
PLEASE FOR THE LOVE OF ALL THINGS SACRED AND TRADEWARS RELATED... !!!ADD A COMMAND TO DUMP VARIABLES TO A FILE!!! ...if I have to sit and and wait through another screen dump of any multiple of 20k lines of array elements, I think that I shall freak out!! This message has been brought to you by Captain Obvious & Captain Morgan |
Author: | ElderProphet [ Wed Aug 24, 2016 2:14 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: TWX Proxy Feature Request |
LS, I feel your pain on the long variable dump. I added code to allow the ESC key to exit a variable dump for that very reason. So go out on a limb... make sure you're using the latest TWX, create a couple of 20K arrays, and start a variable dump. See if ESC bails you out of variable-dump hell. Good luck, +EP+ P.S. - Adept, what does ETA mean? I usually use it for "Estimated Time of Arrival", but I don't think that is how you are using it. |
Author: | LoneStar [ Wed Aug 24, 2016 4:20 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: TWX Proxy Feature Request |
ElderProphet wrote: LS, I feel your pain on the long variable dump. I added code to allow the ESC key to exit a variable dump for that very reason. So go out on a limb... make sure you're using the latest TWX, create a couple of 20K arrays, and start a variable dump. See if ESC bails you out of variable-dump hell. That's great thanks. I don't understand the aversion to a file-dump. You have to agree that searching through a Text File is, at least, 100 times faster and more efficient? |
Author: | Adept [ Thu Aug 25, 2016 1:29 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: TWX Proxy Feature Request |
Oh, edited to add: BTW, are you aware some of those new commands either do not work or will not compile? Such as IIRC (just off the top of my head), truncate, format, and padLeft/padRight. |
Author: | ElderProphet [ Thu Aug 25, 2016 8:28 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: TWX Proxy Feature Request |
LoneStar wrote: That's great thanks. I don't understand the aversion to a file-dump. You have to agree that searching through a Text File is, at least, 100 times faster and more efficient? Adept wrote: Oh, edited to add: BTW, are you aware some of those new commands either do not work or will not compile? Such as IIRC (just off the top of my head), truncate, format, and padLeft/padRight. +EP+ |
Author: | LoneStar [ Thu Aug 25, 2016 11:30 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: TWX Proxy Feature Request |
ElderProphet wrote: LoneStar wrote: That's great thanks. I don't understand the aversion to a file-dump. You have to agree that searching through a Text File is, at least, 100 times faster and more efficient? Adept wrote: Oh, edited to add: BTW, are you aware some of those new commands either do not work or will not compile? Such as IIRC (just off the top of my head), truncate, format, and padLeft/padRight. +EP+ He did answer your question: Edited To Add. I suppose what you're saying re file-dump, effectively is: Request denied (?) |
Author: | ElderProphet [ Fri Aug 26, 2016 9:42 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: TWX Proxy Feature Request |
LoneStar wrote: I suppose what you're saying re file-dump, effectively is: Request denied (?) Man, file-dump would be awesome. I'll put it on my list |
Author: | LoneStar [ Sat Aug 27, 2016 10:42 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: TWX Proxy Feature Request |
ElderProphet wrote: LoneStar wrote: I suppose what you're saying re file-dump, effectively is: Request denied (?) Man, file-dump would be awesome. I'll put it on my list A simple No would have sufficed. not all of us are children. |
Page 6 of 6 | All times are UTC - 5 hours |
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |