| www.ClassicTW.com http://classictw.com/ |
|
| Uploading Avatars http://classictw.com/viewtopic.php?f=20&t=18495 |
Page 1 of 2 |
| Author: | earth [ Fri Jan 26, 2007 4:37 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Please be careful not to upload huge avatars. I deleted one that was uploaded and was 300k. This was causing many pages to load slowly. If this is abused, i will disallow the uploading of avatars and required they be emailed to me. earth. |
|
| Author: | Slim Shady [ Fri Jan 26, 2007 4:56 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
hmmm, wonder whose it was.. |
|
| Author: | Singularity [ Fri Jan 26, 2007 6:19 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
ROTFLOL. Yea, noticed that too. |
|
| Author: | RexxCrow [ Fri Jan 26, 2007 9:59 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Actually, this site is slow irregardless of avatar sizes. It was slow before Traitors cool avatar, it was slow with Traitors cool avatar, and guess what it is slow after Traitors cool avatar... Try validating this site, last I checked (about a month ago) there were are almost 800 little errors throughout it, thus it is running in a very degraded mode... or we can just pretend it is because of avatars, either way, the original site was much better. |
|
| Author: | Traitor [ Fri Jan 26, 2007 10:39 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
The limit was put in place because other people started, or were going to start, using it too. No worries, I will shrink it down to 12524 bytes. Heh. J/K I like my old avatar too much. |
|
| Author: | RexxCrow [ Fri Jan 26, 2007 10:56 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Well this is the only statement listed in regards to uploading avatars, since Earth did not clarify what the actual limits are in his post, though if it is a prob they could always just modify their uploading script to prevent image files that do not meet their stringent requirements: "This is the small icon shown next to your posts. Either select one from the list or type the path in to your own Avatar (must be 90 x 90 pixels)." |
|
| Author: | Singularity [ Sat Jan 27, 2007 12:20 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
Yea, validating the HTML would definately speed up rendering. |
|
| Author: | Slim Shady [ Sat Jan 27, 2007 12:49 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
bring back the old site! |
|
| Author: | Silence [ Sat Jan 27, 2007 1:12 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
You know you'll never make it happen slim. This site may just show you the light, in the coming years... That's if WoS(World of Starcraf) doesn't clamp upon you. |
|
| Author: | Slim Shady [ Sat Jan 27, 2007 1:40 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
WoS... ef that, how about starcraft 2. Thats what i wanna see. |
|
| Author: | Silence [ Sun Jan 28, 2007 12:06 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
You and me both bro. But if they do that, and it is as good as the original, I will bow down forever humble in the greatness of Blizzard. |
|
| Author: | Slim Shady [ Sun Jan 28, 2007 1:55 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
seriously. the original was awesome. IMO broodwar killed it, but thats just me maybe |
|
| Author: | Silence [ Sun Jan 28, 2007 4:57 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
BW killed the original? You have smoked yourself out. How did Medics, lurkers, and Corsairs not even it out? Every single combination with proper support could win a game, if played with intense micro-management. Any race, Anytime. Thats what broodwar did. |
|
| Author: | Slim Shady [ Sun Jan 28, 2007 6:12 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
it's not that they just added a few new units, they also changed costs and other things, it made me sad in the pants. mostly i was just a purist. back when you could do a /whois on someone and see what # they were to register with bnet. was totally awesome. when i was in in the low 100k's and i'd be playin people in the 1m's i knew i was golden (unless they were Kor) kek ^^ |
|
| Author: | Silence [ Sun Jan 28, 2007 6:49 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
bah. not even gameplay related. |
|
| Page 1 of 2 | All times are UTC - 5 hours |
| Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|