Wrong, logs only play a small part of catching someone. Like I said before just because it isn't in the log doesn't mean your not breaking a rule.

What is the point of even defining it? For what purpose?

Allot like subspace crawling is it the most fair thing.... No

But it happens, its not a bug and if you happen to be on the recieving side it sucks to be you.

In such cases, the honest ones will follow the rule, and the dishonest ones will continue to gain advantage by not following it.

You only need to define it if you make a rule against it. If there's no rule there's no problem.


I share your opinion, but it sounds like others disagree and will continue to try to enforce it. In such cases, the honest ones will follow the rule, and the dishonest ones will continue to gain advantage by not following it.

Just say the rule is No Megacorping, only the dishonest will need a definition. Its not "In such cases....", its "In every case...".

Just say the rule is No Megacorping, only the dishonest will need a definition. Its not "In such cases....", its "In every case...".

H

I like that H, plain, simple, and to the point

So it would be easy to apply this rule to, say, the current situation?

You cant enforce a no MC rule, there is no un-biased way. Its all strategy in the right context.

We all start presumably at the same time, we mostly all sit afk with active bots recording chatter. If say on day 3 someone attempts to invade corp A but fails. Its quite easy to decide to also attack corp A as your fairly sure their still weak and the other corp likely will also have used many assets in the process.

Lets say I'm the invading but failed corp. is it MC if i tell someone over icq, etc where they are? Or is it good strategy because i want to bring there assets to my level . What if I didnt actually invade but know that corp C is weaker than A and will fail. Wouldnt it be good tactics to set them up for failure?

I mean the point of the game is to win and in my book short of bugs that's by any means possible.

Including breaking your scripts with a cby command. Sharing tactical information if it benefits me. Or temporary truces because some corp has turtled the entire game.

So it would be easy to apply this rule to, say, the current situation?

That question is moot, there is no rule about megacorping in this BOTE

H

In my oppinion, and the way it would be run on my site if I were to incorporate a no MC or Asset Sharing rule, is that if two teams are working for a common interest, it's a MC.
So that being said, a CEO knowing of such rule, should see that if an attack happens in a game, let them finish before you enter into said attack. If the logs show, or you're able to determine where this attack was held, and you care to move in after and mop up, that's good stratagy. But if there is evidence of the two teams sharing information, or teaming up, they'd both be disqualified.