I also unbanned you, by the way. humble pie huh..

Herzog, your edits for the game in question are nice, I love the ships, but your steal delay is killing me!!! Other than that hey it's decent and I'm glad to see that you and Zero have settled your differences. I personally would have much rather had SD stick around for a couple of weeks atleast. I like the competetion, keeps me coming back to a game every day.


HHH
-Cerebral Assassin

apology excepted but next time be more carefull with your rules. And if I go back to your server I won't blow up SD even if it isn't in the rules. Just double check your rules every once in a while for the sake of all the players on the board [;)].

quote:Originally posted by Zero5005

aparently destroying SD was built in to be a strategic move otherwise they would be indestructable.


shrug, in this case i believe you're right - that SD was made vulnerable for a reason.
but just because something 'works' in TW doesn't necessarily mean it was intended to

easy example: megarob

isn't megarob onlt available in one type of the game??? I admit megarob is very nice (a still enjoy thinking back to the first time I tested it out, took 3.5 mil from the port at 0 exp), but I don't see anyone crying foul when people use it, it's part of the game and everyone needs to get used to it.

if sd was meant not to be blown up like the federals then it would have been programed that way...nuff said.....

zero5005:
megarob started as a worldgroup MBBS bug (before TWGS existed) - was a 'byte overrun' - that let you rob safely over 3. mil etc. etc

- it became so popular and widely used that that very bug is now emulated in TWGS - MBBS mode games

noone i know has a problem with it... and i dont think i said i did either...heh
this was just an example of something that 'works' in TW - yet was not meant to