Thrawn wrote:
Could we please keep this topic on topic? I really don't want to move this out into Smack.
Cheers
If you consider any thing I have posted smack, then quote that part and let me know. If you see smack in this thread, then you should move it. I believe nothing I have posted could be considered any more smack then what SG and Big D both have posted, but I did make a edit to 2 words that and overly sensitive person might view as smack.
Big D wrote:
You need to keep smack talk in the smack forum. You just don't seem to understand that's what it's there for.
This post for example could be taken as smack just in it's self. Big D seems to be the type. "overly sensitive" if you look at his "this is smack" in multiple threads that are non smack threads he seems to feel the need to play moderator or call foul.
Space Ghost wrote:
The Defending Champions will be there.
The lol at the end of this could be considered smack and this is from the top dog on this forum.
Big D wrote:
Team = "Nut Kraakers"
1) Cashew
2) Coconut
3)
This post will be updated as players join corp.
Now this is the second post on this thread and this is from not only the one starting the thread but posting "that is smack" all over the place.
Why would it be smack you say..well in moo2 on fed Big D kept calling us Kraakers and Kraakerheads to try and fed smack. So just his team name in it's self could be considered smack.
I get a kick out of the name being spelled almost the same as our team (Kraaken). makes me wonder if he wished he was on the team. Just a guess.
So Thrawn as I said if you feel this thread should be moved to smack then I'm ok with that. If I have misunderstood and you were talking to D maybe let him know. but from the second post on other then the 2 that wanna play and don't have a team this including the statement to move the thread is technically "smack"